🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is seeking compensation amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step is a clear response by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on reports in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and economic needs.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

European Union officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was immobilized in European countries following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, including confiscating European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent role in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the latest legal action. It has previously noted it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if such holdings can be located," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. They are also crafting safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the complex plan, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be required to repay the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also sends a clear signal that if you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."